Welcome to Comparative Matrix of World Heritage Sites. The main purpose of this matrix is to present the similarities between various World Heritage sites from 25 different dimensions.

These dimensions include historical period, culture type, building type, building style, remain type, intangible contribution, and more. Each dimension has its fixed options, for instance, the intangible contribution dimension corresponds with options such as "Contributes to cultural identity and diversity", "Preserves cultural identity and diversity", "Enriches cultural identity and diversity", "Promotes cultural identity and diversity", and "Connection to cultural identity". If none of these options are suitable for a certain dimension, it will be hidden.

The content in each cell of the matrix is filled with the help of LLMs and is further reviewed manually for accuracy.

We strive to provide the most accurate and useful information. However, if you find any discrepancies or inconsistencies in the displayed results, please do not hesitate to contact us at liangdongqi2023@ia.ac.cn or yuwei.wang@ia.ac.cn. Your feedback is greatly appreciated and will help us improve the quality and accuracy of our table.

This table shows shared characteristics between the cultural heritage selected. The numbers in the table indicates occurrence of the concept in the heritage's Wikipedia description. The concepts are ranked according to their relationship with all of the cultural heritage selected. High rank concepts are supposed to reflect the common features of these culture heritage. Clicking on the number in the table to browse the texts related to the cultural heritage which has mentioned the concept. The concepts are selected from hyperlinks in Wikipedia websites of cultural heritage.

This graph visualizes the relationship between cultural heritage and concepts. Drag the circles to change the layout. Hover over the circles to see the names of the concepts.