Occurrence of Attributes in Original Text

The text related to the cultural heritage 'Archaeological Site of Troy' has mentioned 'Culture' in the following places:
Occurrence Sentence Text Source
The city began as a citadel at the top, ended by covering the entire height to the south (the north being precipitous)[2]HistoryBuilderVarious peoples living in the region at different historical periodsMaterialNative limestone, wood, mudbrickFounded3500 BC from the start of Troy ZeroAbandonedMain periods of abandonment as a residential city:950 BC xe2x80x93 750 BC450 AD xe2x80x93 1200 AD1300 ADCulturesBronze Age (entire)Dark Age (partial)Classical and Hellenistic Periods (entire)Roman Empire (entire)Byzantine Empire (one century)Associatedxc2xa0withLuwian speakers in the Late Bronze Age, Greek speakers subsequentlySite notesArchaeologistsThe Calverts, Heinrich Schliemann, Wilhelm Dxc3xb6rpfeldCarl Blegen and the University of Cincinnati, Manfred Korfmann and the University of Txc3xbcbingen, Rxc3xbcstem Aslan of xc3x87anakkale Onsekiz Mart University (current)ConditionHigh authenticity, low degree of reconstructionOwnershipState property of the Turkish Republic through the Ministry of Culture and TourismManagementGeneral Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museums in conjunction with other relevant local organizationsPublicxc2xa0accessRegular visiting hours, bus access, some parkingWebsiteUnesco WHS 849 UNESCO World Heritage SiteOfficial nameArchaeological Site of TroyTypeCulturalCriteria(ii)(iii)(vi)Designated1998 (22nd session)Referencexc2xa0no.849
According to archaeologist Manfred Korfmann, Troy's location near the Aegean Sea, as well as the Sea of Marmara and the Black Sea, made it a hub for military activities and trade, and the chief site of a culture that Korfmann calls the "Maritime Troja Culture", which extended over the region between these seas.
The University's rector stated that "Pieces unearthed in Troy will contribute to xc3x87anakkalexe2x80x99s culture and tourism.
The discontinuities of culture in different layers might be explained in a number of ways.
For example, in Korfmann 2003, p.xc2xa031 Korfmann elaborates beyond the chronology of Cobet's table to make new proposals regarding the layer, Troy VIIa (which he also presents in the Guidebook): "Troia VIIa should be assigned culturally to Troia VI," asserting that "there were no substantial differences in the material culture between the two periods."
Cities to the east of Troy were destroyed, and although Troy was not burned, the next period shows a change of culture indicating a new people had taken over Troy.
After a suitable interval of hiding somewhere else in the region, perhaps with the Dardanians, who were not defeated, but appeared as marauders among the sea peoples, or further inland with the Hittites, the Trojan remnants returned to Troy to rebuild Troy VIIb, which, according to Blegen, "... obviously represents a direct survival of the culture that prevailed in Troy VIIa.
A mixed culture was certainly possible.
They leveled the top of the mound to construct a temple to Athena, thus identifying themselves as being in the Attic-Ionic culture, as opposed to the Aeolic Greeks (Boeotia) who had previously been settling the north coast of Anatolia.
The 1968 Decree No 3925 of The Superior Council of Immovable Cultural and Natural Property, under the authority of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, designated the Archaeological Site of Troy as a historic site.
The National Parks Department of the Ministry of Forests collaborates with the Ministry of Culture on issues regarding the surrounding landscape.